.
-Mutation.(adjective).mutant.(noun):.is
a change in DNA;
a gene or organism
that has undergone a heritable
change. The simplest mutation occurs when a single nucleotide
(the building blocks of DNA) in a creature's DNA is switched to a different
nucleotide. Mutation rates vary from place to place along the length of
a protein
or nucleic
acid.molecule.
What a mutation cannot do
is change all the instructions embedded within a cell in one step (for
example: forming a bear {with its different nature, shape, breathing and
swimming habits, eating habits, digestive system, etc.} from
a whale).
Most mutations aren't heritable
beyond one generation, and
most
are harmful. Pathological.aggregation
of mutant proteins leads to diseases such
as Alzeimer's, sickle cell anemia and prion
related diseases. Most mutations provide negative results.
The ability to perpetuate
is encoded in
genes. If we are to assume that myriad
mutations made possible the highly complex and ordered organisms we see
in the plant and animal world, we are being asked to deny the fact that
most mutations produce weaker not more 'survival of the fittest' organisms.
One of Darwinian's
tenets.decimates
the other. There just was not enough time for chance
and mutation to work out the order we see today. Evolution is confusion
in motion.
-Natural
selection:.in
evolution; is one of the mechanisms by which it is alleged
evolution has occurred, producing change based upon the likelihood (a synonym
for the word 'chance')
of reproducing and passing genes
on to the next generation.
Natural selection cannot
be imposed regarding the debut
of first life, as natural selection means dissimilar
replication. Natural selection, by its very definition, cannot work on
non-living chemicals, but it does
work.
Natural selection is the
phrase utilized by evolutionists to flow the meaning of intelligent design
into an alleged mysterious process – a process called natural selection,
a process by which claim is made that individuals of a species with characteristics
that help them to become adapted to their specific environment tend
to survive (survival of the fittest) and transmit their characteristics,
while those less adapted, tend to die out, so that in the course of generations
there is a progressive tendency (which somehow according to the 'magical'
process of evolution is supposed to occur) in the species to a greater
degree of adaption.
Understood as acting upon random
mutations, natural selection is an unsound
process.
The Second
Law of Thermodynamics implies disorder in organization over time, therefore
living cells could not have evolved from inanimate chemicals, and multicellular
life could not have evolved from protozoa.
Fact is, God designed gene
sequences
to be consistent throughout different species.
Natural selection's answer is that this sequence.somehow.survived
change. In other words, things changed around it driven by this mysterious
natural selection, but for some reason evolution believes that gene sequences
weren't affected by natural selection.
That reason being, that it
was too important to be altered, implying
some intelligence is involved. So, evolution is saying that change occurs
to things it deems
of lesser importance.
By this reasoning, it also
suggests change isn't important. Evolution hides ten miles behind the wall
of scientific facts to avoid accounting for genes that turn other genes
either off or on.
Natural selection 'becomes
arrogant'
in claiming that just because we cannot account for a structure, does not
mean that one does not exist; for example: for years it was thought the
appendix was of no use, but now we are learning that it has importance
to the immune system. So it is with the intermediaries
to AMP.
And so it is with categorizing
the human genome, understanding
the brain, etc. Everywhere in nature we see structure of.immense.design,
even in the common dandelion,
and like genes that may be 'turned
on' later....more
on natural selection continues here
-Neanderthal
man:.The
authors of this report in.Cell,
determined that the variation between Neanderthal
and modern mtDNA,
was four times than that between any two modern humans, and their were
not any special similarities to modern humans in
Europe.
Re: Russia's Caucasus Mountains
find: Matthias Hoss, molecular biologist, and expert in ancient remains,
now working at the Swiss Institute for Cancer Research, said the research
appears to support the theory that Neanderthals were an evolutionary dead
end. ...as reported in.The
Calgary Herald, March 29, 2000.
